Since a few daysíthat's how it startedó average noiseáguy that looksíto come a few months ago, if you are lateó the start of constructionón of the new airport, but ¿becauseé them insteadó the constructionón of the new Daular Airport?
Possibly, Remember that a few months ago I publishedé a mega post about history, present, aerolílines and construction projectón of the one they call «Mega Aeropuerto Daular«.
In this publicationón and at least 6 añthe atreás, the authorities of Guayaquil with great fanfareíhave announced that for thisñO 2018 Startíto the constructionón of tan emblemático project: www.nlarenas.com/2017/06/guayaquil-2018-mega-aeropuerto-daular/.
This project will beíto beá the airport sás largest of the regionón, thought to have 3 landing strips in their final stage, adaptable and modal terminal so that in its first stage it can support a tráI stay 10 million passengers annually and that fáI could easilyíto increase up to más de 25 millions.
In a land 2.020 Hectoráareas the possibilities are almost limitless. In this space the airport will haveíto an enviable growth capacity throughout the regionón and with one of his 3 tracks with 4.100 meters long, to allowían direct flights málong steps to connect Ecuador with the world.
¿Becauseé them insteadó the constructionón of the new Daular Airport?
The answer is very fácil: the tránumber of both national and international passengers does not justify an investmentón so big al dífrom today.
The statesístatics speak for themselvesí solas. Guayaquil Airport in the úlast toñhas seen you as the núnumber of users does not grow at the rate or speed that a mega investmentón required to be justified before investors and municipal authorities.
Despite this growth that exists, the Númere are still not favorable to be able to make an investmentówhat caníto surpass the $900 millions of dólares in a construction periodón of 6 años.
The current terminal has a capacity to handle 7 million and a half passengers per yearñor after úlast extensionón and improvement recently releasedén the añO 2014, and the almost 4 current millions toúThey make it a loose terminal and very far from collapsing, withí happens at other airports in the regionón as is the case of Lima.
¿Whaté factors have influenced?
- Quito airport: hereí There are two points that need to be clarified..
- First, Tababela in its beginningsí generó an affectationón in the tráI'm giftéstatic in all airports in the countryís, generated exclusively by the lack of víaccess aces at its inaugurationón, but in the traáinternational airport this airport continues to grow. Ecuadorians are notáWe were used to that distance and time, this landscape has been changing.
- The second, and the máIt's important, is due to the important attractionón of new aerolídenies, frequencies and increased capacity that generateó thanks to the new facilities, like the runway. ¿In thaté This affects Guayaquil? I know how to clarifyá más down.
- Economía: It is known that Ecuador is not in the best condition.ón económica from various toños, less income or mistrust, people consume less, therefore travel less, spending less to secure the future.
- fuel subsidy: la eliminationón of aviation fuel subsidyón in the añO 2015 brought a significant drop in theápassenger traffic throughout the countryís, especially on the Quito route – Guayaquil, which until then was the second más important of Latinamérich in passengers and daily frequencies.
- distances: New roads have reduced land travel times and are the main competition for airlines.ílines and airports.
- city factor: as i said in the first point, Quito has managed to attract new airlinesílines and frequencies (hereí I explain it), especially in the international, but this has to do with this phrase aeronáutica that I love: «the aerosolsílines fly where it isá the business, where there are passengers».
- Guayaquil is the city más populated Ecuador, but this does not mean that people fly moreáI know that in Quito. The capital of Ecuador has fewer inhabitants, but its people fly más, so much giftéstic as internationally. if people don't fly, not arriveán the aerosolsídenies.
- We are a paíit's very smallñO, Although both Quito and Guayaquil are important economicallyómica and population, the aerosolsíairlines prefer to operate to a single airport, to which más profit is going to leave them and reach the other in agreement with Aerolísocial or local lines. Let's say the airíLine X arrives in Quito and connects to Guayaquil local Z, así does not spend on personnel and operationsón in two airports so close.
- Factor Tame: it's no secret to anyone, to Tame affect crisisó to all airports. They reduced frequencies, they canceled routes and moved others. In the case of Guayaquil, Tame canceló the route to Esmeraldas, Latacunga – Coca and recently to Cuenca, while alsoén reduced frequencies to Loja. in the international, to moveó the route más demanded from Guayaquil which is New York to Quito. It is añopen itó the route to Bogotaá and keep flying to Fort Lauderdale, help the núheritage.
- Factor aerolídenies: by the same city factor, Guayaquil has lost Iberia flights, Delta y United, which clearly diminishes its núgroupers and projections. He has won those of Spirit Airlines and Air Europa, but they do not replace the ones that have already left. We hope you return with theúgroupers on the rise.
- Taxes and fees: the tax factor was discussed in this post and I recommend that you read it and see it in detail: www.nlarenas.com/2018/02/entrevista-costos-tasas-aeroportuarias-quito-guayaquil/
- Ticket costs: The tickets in Ecuador are expensive and that stillálysis you can read it hereí: www.nlarenas.com/2017/09/por-que-son-tan-caros-los-pasajes-aereos-en-ecuador/. This affects the entire local industry, with more competition, all the actors can be seenán benefited.
- Graduationón turnístic: Guayaquil has given up land in a tourist wayística in front of Quito, where the investmentón to be the gateway to Ecuador It has been superior and the results are evident.
StadiumíPassenger statics at Guayaquil Airport
The municipal authorities of Guayaquil have indicated that to begin constructionón of the new airport, the tráinternational passenger traffic has to reach the 3.5 million annually, which is nowán very far away. What isá passing in the josé Joaquín de Olmedo, is that the airport isá growing, but not at the rate 2011 O 2014 and 2015, but growing steadilyún show the statusístatic:
2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | |
3.458.854 | 3.716.926 | 3.820.669 | 3.884.068 | |
Variationón | 7,5% | 2,8% | 1,7% |
There is a brake on growth, sí, but that is not why the airport has stopped growing, although globally, have 1 millón fewer passengers than the Quito Airport and a mega investmentóWhat is Daular like?, it's excessive right now.
Stadiumístatic passenger doméstatic
On Sunday flightséstics we see growth from the 2016, but what toún does not reach the bestñor compared to what is 2015:
2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | |
TOTAL | 1,803,274 | 2,184,882 | 2,052,315 | 2,085,389 |
Passengers on Sunday routeséstatic
The effect of Tame on the routes to Latacunga is clear, Esmeraldas, Loja and Cuenca, más the notable decline of the trádispute between Quito and Guayaquil after the eliminationón of the fuel subsidy, although it has grown thanks to the routes to Galápayments mainly:
ROUTES | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 |
QUITO-GUAYAQUIL | 833.366 | 739.009 | 693.950 | 693.872 |
GUAYAQUIL-QUITO | 824.081 | 722.226 | 690.049 | 727.164 |
GUAYAQUIL-CUENCA | 35.515 | 31.357 | 20.114 | 2.550 |
CUENCA-GUAYAQUIL | 35.763 | 33.353 | 20.079 | 4129 |
QUITO-GUAYAQUIL-BALTRA | 215.016 | 220.315 | 249608 | |
BALTRA-GUAYAQUIL-QUITO | 219.198 | 214.488 | 232653 | |
QUITO-GUAYAQUIL-SAN CRISTOBAL | 74.087 | 73.039 | 82295 | |
SAN CRISTOBAL-GUAYAQUIL-QUITO | 66.908 | 68.469 | 74915 | |
GUAYAQUIL-LATACUNGA | 7.617 | 12.027 | 3.395 | 304 |
LATACUNGA-GUAYAQUIL | 6.209 | 11.139 | 3.382 | 235 |
GUAYAQUIL-LOJA | 17.730 | 16.973 | 11.410 | 8063 |
LOJA-GUAYAQUIL | 16.966 | 16.604 | 11.599 | 7584 |
GUAYAQUIL-ESMERALDAS | 13.843 | 14.259 | 10.943 | 0 |
EMERALDS-GUAYAQUIL | 12.184 | 12.726 | 9.067 | 0 |
TOTAL | 1.803.274 | 2.184.882 | 2.052.315 | 2.085.389 |
Stadiumíinternational passengers
The AñO 2017, was the bestñor for the Guayaquil Airport of the úlast 4 años, a major boost, but very far from 3 million and a half that the authorities are looking for to start constructionón:
2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | |
TOTAL | 1,655,580 | 1,532,044 | 1,768,354 | 1,798,679 |
Passengers on international routes
The 2017 It was alsoén the best añor internationally and far exceeds the 2014. The route to Panamaá is the one that más grows and the one that más passengers move in Guayaquil, followed by Bogotáá and Miami, although this úThe latter shows a decrease in passengers transported in the 2017. New York tooén lowers his núpassenger grouper, once más by the Tame effect:
ROUTES | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 |
AMSTERDAM | 92.914 | 96.359 | 99.601 | 99.111 |
ARUBA | N/A | N/A | 326 | 594 |
BARCELONA (VENEZUELA) | N/A | 5.056 | 40.817 | 43.994 |
BOGOTA | 204.235 | 201.762 | 199.995 | 237.534 |
GOOD AIR | 54.847 | 13.230 | N/A | N/A |
CALI | 30.942 | 32.882 | 32.616 | 41.347 |
CARACAS | 39 | N/A | 335 | N/A |
THE SAVIOR | 55.529 | 61.032 | 49.547 | 50.657 |
FOR LAUDERDALE | 3.795 | 25.936 | 41.174 | 51.251 |
PEACE | N/A | N/A | 3.034 | 4.270 |
LIMA | 179.470 | 154.954 | 182.691 | 192.709 |
MADRID | 108.176 | 107.786 | 118.092 | 166.700 |
MIAMI | 252.455 | 256.745 | 242.562 | 229.414 |
NEW YORK | 261.919 | 156.915 | 267.583 | 185.949 |
PANAMÁ | 324.383 | 342.874 | 392.997 | 398.240 |
SANTIAGO | 86.876 | 76.513 | 96.984 | 96.909 |
TOTAL | 1,655,580 | 1,532,044 | 1,768,354 | 1,798,679 |
StadiumíPassenger Statics Quito Airport
For reference and to understand that the tráfico tooén has been affected throughout Ecuador, It is good to know the data of the main Ecuadorian airport in Doméstic and international.
The statesíQuito buildings show, unlike Guayaquil, a decreaseños 2015 and 2016, generated exclusively by sun flightséstatic, since international growth continues every yearños. Sayén the 2017 he turnedó to have global growth although driven by the international with 1.5% and -0.9% in the sunéstic:
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | |
5.421.106 | 5.574.019 | 5.376.544 | 4.852.530 | 4.875.166 | |
Variationón | 2.4% | 2.8% | -3.5% | -9.7% | 0.5% |
*Variationón average corresponds to tráI stay nationally and internationally.
Until May 2018, Quito Airport has seen a increase of 4.6% in comparisonón with the añO 2017, having served in 5 months to 2,058,554 passenger.
** StadiumíDGAC statics, Municipality of Quito and others.
Passenger projections Guayaquil Airport
With current data and based on the growth of úlast 4 años, sayén for the añO 2031 Guayaquil Airport passíto the 3 million and a half passengers, taking into account the averages and a projection modelón:
For that same oneñO 2031, Guayaquil Airport arrivingíto the 6 million one hundred thousand passengers between sunéaesthetic and international based on current growth averages. With this numberúmero, the airport will haveía aún ability to 1 millón and a half más of passengers before reaching its limit:
An additional exercise playing with the numbersúheritage, if the average annual growth were 8% (varying between the 9% and 7 %), the goal of 3.5 millions of passengers will meetíbefore beforeñO 2026:
¿Whaté Can be done?
The Guayaquil Airport already has incentives for new airlinesídenies, all that isán performing, it is very positive, you have to keep it and push it. The image of the city must be improved as an attractive and profitable destination for these companies, that does not depend on the airport directly.
The Airport can't do anything about the economy.íto the país, does not correspond to him and is oblivious to his activities. Either, can compete with ground transportation, nor with the city factor, but yesí it can help, ask for help or support for the generationófield no.ñAtracci'són, as general ideas being part of tourism fairs, aviationón like Routes and others.
Guayaquil as a city, must improve its imageístics worldwide, this corresponds to both the Municipality and the Ecuadorian Government. It depends on this that IáForeigners want to fly to Ecuador, therefore más aerolídenies, without leaving aside that the guayaquileñowes them tooén fly outside, and ohí, la eliminationón of the Eco Delta Tax will beívery good to reduce the cost of tickets and that máEcuadorians fly (help everyoneís).
Conduct market studies for potential new domestic routeséstatic tooéIt is not necessary and that is mainly the job of the airlines.ídenies, but we must work together and in alliances to generate these documents that generateán benefits for the airport, city and countryís. For example, a direct route from Guayaquil to El Coca or Lago Agrio couldíto be very attractive, the studies will tellán.
A differentiating factor must be sought and exploited. Guayaquil is the main economic cityóbit of breadís, this mustíto be an advantage and look for example, the business passenger as a source of growth and attractionón of aerolílines whose business isá in that niche.
There are many máI know what to do, but mainly in a personal way, Eastá in cómo be promoted, both airport and city. Both must work for a single purpose., not thinking only about the constructionón of the Daular, but alsoén, in socio-economic developmentómica of the city, that as a benefit it will haveá reach the 8 millions of passengers that allow us to start or think about the constructionóNo. of Mega Airport.
The úonly way to grow, is that frequencies are increased, new aerosols arriveídenies, destinations that are not currently flown are exploited, those that have gone will resume and a great impulse will beáon sun flightséstatic, that a lot depends on the policiesílocal ethics such as the reviewón of taxes that make tickets more expensive and slow down the marketéreo, which throughout the world is a fundamental axis of development and economicía.
Desafíor short term
The main challengeíO, given the indefinite postponement of constructionón de Daular, Eastá on the runway of Guayaquil Airport. Life úfor part úlast general paving runs outáPlease, given the weather conditionsáethics and normal use of operations.
the track of 2.790 meters, already requires several closures where emergent works are carried out several times, during theñO, for patching the asf folderálithic that is worn and affected by the continuous normal wear and tear of the operationón of más de 120 daily operations that ahí are made.
The authorities will now haveán have to locate a specific budgetífic to extend life útrack tool, which may require interventionócomplete n, with its operational closures for several daysíup to weeks, all depending on cóhow to get this job done.
This general and complete maintenance of the track will beá what to do sooner or later, with the consequent inconvenience for Aerolílines and users due to the closures that will beán what to do.
In these toños, you can seek to continue improving current operations, update procedures and systems to keep the airport current and on par with the rest of the airports in the regionón, that until today, Eastá about the great majoría.
¿Cuáing to buildá Daular? There is no exact date and beá now yesí, very difficultíIt was easy to know exactly until the authorities in someños, announce it again.
*** The reason for this post is to show a visionón different from what happens with the Guayaquil Airport and to propose some ideas, that surely isán working or have been thought about before.
¿Whaté should beíwhat to do to boost the growth of this airport?
I think the same as Cmdte Edwin Suarez
Here they lack vision. Example: The Savior, The city of Salvador has a small tourist offer, however it is a hub of connections. Guayaquil, due to its location, could be an excellent hub that can compete and be an alternative to Jorge Chávez airport in Lima or El Dorado airport in Bogotá, which are at full capacity.. It is a lack of vision to justify that the passenger traffic of 7 millions do not justify it, you should think with a mentality from here to 20 years and the statistical projection should be exponentially increasing considering the potential benefits of a hub.
It is important to lower taxes and fuel and allow the sustained growth of the flow of passengers to be the decisive element to start the construction of the new airport.
900 million is nothing calculated to 50 years.
Greetings
Fantastic Nicholas, unbiased and very professional analysis, I think your type of analysis is unique in the country. I have two concerns and I would like to know your comments… Do you think that the Quito airport needs an expansion?? and second, Guayaquil being a maritime port, It takes space away from the airport, unlike Quito , that without a port is strengthened in its air cargo ( example the flowers ) ? Thank you for your kind comments…
Thank you Carlos for your comment.. In fact, Quito Airport is already expanding, they will finish it during the 2020. The Port is undoubtedly a direct competition for GYE.
Many of us agree that the regionalism factor is the one that prevails in Ecuador
Quito is the capital and has its natural advantages that no one disputes, but it is very true of the pressure from the authorities to further favor Quito in all aeronautical aspects of new airlines induced to fly to Quito and not to Guayaquil
Someone asked about the Avianca Guayaquil Buenos Aires route and no one answered. The answer is that before the "open skies" that route was tame and I never loosen it despite the fact that it was never able to operate it, then they already forgot and they did it from Quito
Better not ask to remove ashes that the truth can be expensive
It is time to let the principle announced by Nicolas take effect
The airlines fly where the passengers are, which is true as long as they do not put obstacles or pressure or insinuations, how to want them to fly to Salinas Santa Rosa among others and spend millions uselessly where there are no passengers
You have evidence to say that Quito is favored over Guayaquil or that the routes are "induced"? Tame's route to Buenos Aires always operated from Quito and Avianca Ecuador intended to operate it doing Quito – Guayaqil – Buenos Aires, always starting in Quito and the open skies have nothing to do with this.
Nicholas, Cheers. I am glad to know how well informed you are with the figures you present.. The common mortal does not know them for their different activities. I see it normal.
The issue of regionalism and centralism is big. You can't compete against that., nor is it your role to analyze it in this forum. Anywhere in the world the capital of a country, It has its advantages that are increased by the way of doing politics in this Ecuador.
Thank you Ignatius, Cheers!
Another important factor is that at the current airport, people who arrive from the provinces by bus are at the bus terminal, which is close to the airport., On the other hand, in Daular a race would be very expensive
It could also be an additional factor.
Good Morning:
I understood that Avianca considered the Guayaquil route – Buenos Aires, who knows about the subject ??
Greetings
JIMMY
This was the last that was known: http://www.nlarenas.com/2017/08/avianca-ecuador-pide-volar-buenos-aires/
Estimated:
Lately I read your column that I think is very good, I want to express my comment .
Unfortunately, regionalism prevails on this issue. Much has been done to annoy and annoy the operation of this airport
Tame previously flew the Guayaquil route – New York which was transferred to Quito. I understand that the Guayaquil route – New York is very profitable and had a very high occupancy, hence the transfer of the operation to Quito is not understood unless it is a question of favoring one airport to the detriment of another.
It is indicated that the city has not been adequately promoted, this is also a regional issue. I have had the opportunity to travel abroad and government entities promote Quito in the first place, the east and the Galapagos Islands; Guayaquil does not exist for them; I remember a comment, if I remember correctly, from an official of the Guayaquil Airport Authority who indicated that on a flight that was bound for Quito (Tame's Flight) A passenger found out that Guayaquil "existed" and when he consulted aircraft personnel, they told him loose bones. "Nothing good is lost."
It is indicated that in Guayaquil there is no passenger demand, I don't know figures but the fact that Quito has more flights is explained by the fact that the embassies are in Quito, government agencies, etc. and this obviously creates a demand. In Guayaquil there is demand what there are not are accessible flights except with stopovers .
Hi jimmy, Thank you very much for your comment. Regarding regionalism, it is not my responsibility to analyze it, more than aeronautics and even, tourist. The issue of transfers of government entities, embassies, etc. Yes, favors Quito, but there Guayaquil should look for a way to differentiate itself and promote itself in another way, with self-management.
regionalism ??????!!!!!!!!!!!
Don't touch that topic
Excellent analysis that was made of the problems facing the growth of passengers, however, a fundamental issue that should be analyzed was not found, the offer of a new airport.
Large airports with a large flow of passengers such as Bogotá and Lima, they are increasingly with less space to handle flights, and this does not mean that all passengers visit Colombia or Peru, it's just transit airports, for connections; Another example that can be cited is the San Salvador airport, which the 90% of passengers use it for connections. In other words, if the authorities decided on the immediate construction of the Guayaquil airport, it is much easier to offer it as a new Holding for companies like AVIANCA or LATAM who have the capacity to grow but lack space; For this reason, I dare say that the tourist attraction or the economy of a city or country is not necessary for it to have a mega airport and for it to operate profitably., but rather the offer and competitiveness that it can offer to the market so that it is attractive to invest and bet on it., call it taxes or bureaucratic obstacles; and by the hand of this work, take advantage of the source of work and income that would represent not only the city but the country, to increase the internal tourist offer, attracting new visitors.
The theme of a HUB is that Lima and Bogotá are the strengths of both airlines and they will not sacrifice what they have achieved there to give it to them and start from scratch in a new one.. Although it is an interesting idea that in the face of the collapse of, for example, Lima, some flights move to Guayaquil, It is not attractive because in Guayaquil passengers must also get on the plane and not only in connection, that's the problem.
Excellent explanation Nicholas, especially with numerical data that reflect the reality of air traffic in Ecuador.
The authorities should continue working so that the costs of the tickets go down, airport taxes…. Suddenly, local airlines form subsidiaries to offer commercial services and cargo to and from small airports with aircraft that adapt to the needs and thus provide more connectivity as TAME Amazonía does. There are underutilized airports where cargo transportation could be an option to attract investment.
there's a lot to do, you just have to do and want to do it.
It is reality what I say, but I ask, The AAG is said to have increased the rates of use of the airport and it is said that they are higher than that of Quito. is this true?
What do the city authorities do to convince us Guyaquileños to use our airport?, With that, the companies would be forced to share frequencies with Quito and not force us to use the one from there..
Guayaquil was the port of departure for travelers from the basin, machala, manabi, the rivers, apart from Guayaquil, but for example, At the time that Tame eliminates the basin route to Guayaquil, Cuencanos will have the connection to Quito, losing that logical place for our airport.
Travel agencies in our city must work with our airport , For that, they need advantages that aeronautical policies should provide..
I read the worst scenario will occur when we Guayquileños will have to travel to Quito to take an international connection, with the inconvenience that this implies and the tremendous loss of time that occurs when a connection is made in tababela. Obviously, the operator of the Tababela airport is interested in gaining more users, for the same reason our authority must fight.
Excuse me for asking these questions, I do it as a Guayaquil citizen concerned about our city and our rights. I do not do it for the purpose of criticism, just to know the subject better and know the reasons and struggles that we have to assume for our well-being.
Greetings
I recommend this post about the rates of Guayaquil and Quito: http://www.nlarenas.com/2018/02/entrevista-costos-tasas-aeroportuarias-quito-guayaquil/