¡the aviationón and war!
Opinion columnón for: Maximiliano Naranjo Iturralde
In his work “The Right to Fly”, John C. Cooper picks up the “History of Rasselas, PríAbyssinia”, of the English writerés Samuel Johnson; refers that the artíI guess I knewíto the value of mechanical forcesáunique and the possibility of giving man wings, sentenceó:
“If all men were virtuous I would teach themñaríin a hurry, everyone on the flight. But, ¿thaté security will haveíeven the good ones if the bad ones at their whim could invade them from the heavens? Against an axisército sailing through the clouds, neither walls nor mountainsñeven seas will not be able toíto give security …”.
the aviationón international trade at a global level has unquestionably been one of the mostás affected, derived from the pandemic, what has caused the disappearanceón of thousands of thousands of jobs and incalculables pérdidas económicas. In these daysías, has become more acute as a result of premeditated, artful and unfair invadeón a Ukraine, by Russia, led by a totalitarian leader whoñnow the Uni timesóNo. of RepúSovi Socialist blicséethics (USSR) and the former policeíthe secret, la ex KGB.
Inspired by expansionist desires and encouraged by his enormous and uncontrolled ego, the modern Tsar, Eastá creating a dangerous scenario that can impact the balance of the current world order, when embarking on an adventure béscale of proportions: we all know cómo start, but never cuándo and cómo finish. You destroy itówhat isá causing the unequal war is similar to those that generated the previous perverse ones.
As a result of this, paíThey have reacted by taking some measures that directly affect the airline sector., between them, has been that of prohibit overflight of aircraft over its territory, in use of the principle of sovereigntyíwhat they exert on their spaceéreo. In this way, The United States of America has proceededérica, Canadaá and the Unión European (EU) regarding the líneas aéareas of Russia, y así lo replicó Russia, as for the líneas aéareas of the US. Canadaá and the EU.
The Convention on Aviationón Civil International, signed in Chicago, the 7 from December to 1944, in his preáBlot, contemplate: “that it is desirable to avoid all dissensionóbetween nations and peoples and promote cooperation among themón on which the peace of the world depends”. The artíass 89 previó what “in case of war, The provisions of this Convention shall not affectán freedom of actionón of the Contracting States affected, whether belligerent or neutral…”. In that sense, The Contracting States are free to adopt any measures they deem necessary., like the prohibitionón of the overflight, landing and exercise of traffic rightsáaerocommercial fico.
Having said that, así like aviationón civil is an instrument at the service of humanity, that contributes to the development and progress of people, the large capacity béaircraft technology is impressively lethal and destructive, same thing that can change -and in fact has changed-, the course of wars in a dramatic wayáethics, how it happenedó in the two great world conflagrations.
The repudiation of Putin - and his evilébecomes invadedón-, it's aánime and generalized: lírights from around the world individually and at the UN, have expressed themselves condemning this insane event that puts the world in a situationón of terror, if other pron actions are unleashedóreserved static, además of the so-called current actions, that have caused only death and destructionón.
Europe and the world isán in danger, unless the pressureón of the international community – every time Iás broad and growing, achieve the withdrawal of Russian troops from Ukrainian territory, if he engages in a frank dialogue with interventionsónumber of observers and mediators, and reparation actions are establishedón caused against a free peopleégreat and heroic like Ukraine.
the aviationón “science and art of human flight” requires continuing to be an instrument of Peace and not of war.
Now, why are US invasions good and clean and when another country defends itself they are bad?, soooo bad??? Don't you really think that your analysis is just objective and biased without any element of objectivity?? For example, it does not mention the short and medium range missiles that they were going to put in Ukraine.
The US invasions have had the objective of claiming territories or annexing others in conflict, such as Crimea, for example.? Just that question I'm waiting for the answer, of short or medium range missiles applies to both sides of the story, no one wants to have them around, neither Russia nor the European Union.
Larenas when you say: «la aviación “ciencia y arte del vuelo humano” requiere seguir siendo instrumento de Paz y no de guerra.» ¿ Se refiere por ejemplo al uso que hizo EEUU En, for instance, ex Yugoslavia o Irak
Biole. You should read that I didn't write this, but Mr. Maximiliano Naranjo, You can direct your complaints or comments to the columnist. Greetings.
A political comment with a marked bias towards sanctifying the great culprit of this genocide, the United States, and demonizing a country that fights for an act of justice, such as RUSSIA..
Hello Rupert, Thanks for your comment. It is your point of view and it is respected equally..
Your analysis of the serious situation in the world is very interesting.. Every day that passes, The problem is complicated and involves more countries with losses of all kinds. Humans mainly.
greetings Nicholas.
Greetings Ignacio and congratulations go to Maximiliano.